EDITOR'S PAGE
The red brick wall syndrome
Our high-priced technological inoculations seemed to have paid off in dispatching
the Y2K bug. If recent record-breaking sales and book-to-bill figures
are any indication, those preemptive efforts didn't hurt the ongoing recovery
in the semiconductor industry either, as some of the billions of dollars
spent on upgrading systems and software poured into chip company coffers
as well as those of their suppliers. Now that the euphoria of the global
celebrations has begun to wear off and the holiday shutdowns recede into
memory, the pressing business of pushing chipmaking manufacturing technology
into the new century resumes its relentless pace. As a reminder of how
much work remains to be done, the recently released International Technology
Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS) depicts a sometimes daunting future,
in terms of both industry economics and technical advances.
The ITRS's section on defect reduction has some sobering passages.
There's a lot of what I call "the red brick wall syndrome." Those familiar
with the roadmap's color-keyed tables and charts know that white represents
"solutions exist," yellow depicts "solutions being pursued," and red means
"no known solutions." In three of the four focus topics, the tables present
a grim defect scenario for the 20032005 time frame, unless technical
breakthroughs escalate over the next couple of years. The yield model
and defect budget technology requirements table for microprocessors shows
random process-induced defect budgets for 31 generic tool types scaled
to 75-nm critical defect size or better. In the 2003 column, which figures
to be somewhere between the 100- and 70-nm process nodes, 18 of the 31
tools see red, with the remaining 13 in the yellow zone. In 2004, when
the 70-nm node debuts, there is a solid crimson barrier, with all 31 tool
types stuck on "no known solution." The defect detection requirements
table fares a bit better in 2004, with 9 of 14 slots in the yellow and
the other 5 in the red, but the 2005 column goes red in 10 categories.
The dark flow continues on the defect sources and mechanisms table, which
reveals 5 of 9 areas in the red in 2004 and all but 1 bleeding out in
2005. The good news in the section can be found in the defect prevention
and elimination technology requirements, all of which have existing or
pursued solutions well into the next decade.
We've taken a two-pronged approach to discussing the ITRS
in this month's issue. Our lead Industry News story starting on page 14
deals with the potential economic impact of the roadmap's R&D requirements
on the semiconductor foodchain, especially the equipment, material, and
component supplier companies. Serious doubts linger that the returns on
R&D investment are enough to keep companies comfortably in the black.
"I'm not convinced," muses former SEMI/Sematech head Paul Peercy in the
story, "that we have proved that the industry generates enough revenue
to sustain this technology acceleration indefinitely."
The other part of our roadmap coverage focuses on the differences
between the respective defect reduction technology sections of the 1997
and 1999 documents. Dave Jensen and his fellow working group travelers
sum up the state of defect affairs in the ITRS Update article beginning
on page 39. A better understanding of the systematic component of yield
loss, high-speed inspection tools capable of examining high-aspect ratio
features, defect-free process equipment, and advanced data mining and
management tools and techniques are all on their hit list of current and
future challenges. I strongly encourage you to check out the entire ITRS
document, which can be accessed at http://www.itrs.net/1999_SIA_Roadmap/Home.htm.
The roadmap also helps guide my editorial planning for the year,
so expect to see many references in MICRO throughout 2000 to the ITRS
as well as articles inspired by its technological signposts.
Tom Cheyney
Editor
tom.cheyney@cancom.com
http://www.micromagazine.com

MicroHome |
Search | Current Issue | MicroArchives
Buyers Guide | Media Kit
Questions/comments about MICRO Magazine? E-mail us at cheynman@gmail.com.
© 2007 Tom Cheyney
All rights reserved.
|