EDITOR'S PAGE
The Arizona Moto-cosm
My recent trip to Arizona brought home again how the region is a microcosm
of the semiconductor industry. A strong supplier infrastructure supports
a cluster of major fabs, while the research community boasts two of the
leading institutions in the semiconductor realm, Arizona State University
and the University of Arizona. The big news on everyone's minds and lips
is Intel's plans to build its volume 300-mm production plant in Chandler,
a move that already has the vendor community scrambling and the other
chipmakers in the area fearing further drains on the nearly tapped talent
pool.
A key stop during my visit was Motorola's MOS-6. The 6-in. fab is in
an expansion mode, doing the balancing act of increasing capacity through
construction of additional manufacturing space while continuing to push
product out. Several managers took time out to sit down and talk with
me, discussing the "new" Motorola and the present and future state of
the industry.
Like most thoughtful people in the chip realm, one of the main things
on these engineers' minds is how to manage the maniacal up-and-down economic
roller-coaster that the semiconductor world suffers and enjoys. As one
of the guys put it, "how do you turn capacity on quickly and in a cost-effective
manner?" Motorola SPS banks on "standardization of capacity" to help smooth
out those troublesome business cycles. This strategy pushes uniform design
rules as well as more-standard processing and tool sets, taking a page
from Intel's "copy exactly" approach. Within Moto there's an equipment
standardization council and efforts to standardize process modules, helping
the reinvented industry giant to move more like a cheetah than an elephant.
Our conversations also included some prognostications on how fabs might
look in 5 to 10 years. Some talking points seem more like a wish list,
while others track perfectly with trends already in motion. Highly automated
superfabs built by two or more companies in alliances or joint ventures
will become more prevalent. Processes will be almost exclusively single
wafer and take place in small-volume chambers. There will be more wafers
per product run in terms of die volume even though the devices themselves
will be more integrated. Much better process control mechanisms will be
in place so that tool downtime and other persnickety production hiccups
will become less of a problem for operations managers and their staffs.
Wafer processing will be much greener in the future, the Motorolans
believe. Through better management of both incoming and outgoing materials,
the goal of the zero discharge fab is not far-fetched. As one engineer
put it, "you have to solve input to get at output," which means reducing
the amount of chemicals used as well as increasing the use of dilute chemistries.
One area currently lacking emphasis, according to one engineer, is gas
use reduction, a hint to the supplier community of a possible niche to
explore.
Totally "lights out" or peopleless fabs are not seen as realistic, even
in 10 years, though the advent of 300-mm will bring it closer to fruition.
The increase in automation has a couple of consequences. It requires different
engineering expertise for tool support, necessitating more mechanical
engineers to keep things running well. One manager also pointed out a
side effect of automation he's already seeing among the operators or associates--boredom.
Some of the rank and file who used to do much of the work the robots now
perform have asked for transfers because of the lack of challenge and
general mind-numbing repetition.
There's no lack of challenges and few repetitive tasks in the Motorola
managers' jobs. But there is a danger of burnout and increasing talk of
"exit strategies." This should come as no surprise. If you're working
80-hour weeks and your friends in other businesses make the same or better
money with saner hours, wouldn't you consider your options outside the
semiconductor industry?
Tom Cheyney
Editor
tom.cheyney@cancom.com
http://www.micromagazine.com

MicroHome |
Search | Current Issue | MicroArchives
Buyers Guide | Media Kit
Questions/comments about MICRO Magazine? E-mail us at cheynman@gmail.com.
© 2007 Tom Cheyney
All rights reserved.
|