EDITOR'S PAGE
Ping-ponging in my head
This year's Semicon West season finds business booming and memories
of the last downturn nothing more than a bitter, dissipated aftertaste.
Rather than replow the same ground as other industry observers and talk
about changing economic models, tech stock jitters, DRAM undercapacity,
300-mm fab construction, or low-k defectivity issues, I'd like to share
some odd concepts, questions, and observations that have been ping-ponging
around in my head recently. It's my way of toasting SEMI on its 30th birthday
and celebrating this month's MICRO, the biggest regular issue of our 18-year
run.
Take the fickle nature of time in the chipmaking realm. Most folks are
familiar with the concept of dog years, a bit of biologically based urban
folklore that says there are seven canine cycles for each human cycle.
Any dog-lover knows that the 7:1 ratio is only an average, since our loveable
mutts age more quickly when they're young and more slowly in their golden
years. What I would like to see is a dog-year equivalent for the rate
of microelectronic progressa "chip years" measure. Perhaps one could
fashion an equation or model for semiconductor life spans by comparing
them with the product cyclefrom design through final manufacturing
and eventual market lifeof a Boeing jetliner or a Ford car. I challenge
those statistically minded and temporally challenged readers to come up
with a way to measure this elongation/contraction of time, or at least
to comment on the possibilities. Selected contributions will be posted
on a special section of MICRO's Websitewww.micromagazine.comin
the next few months.
Speaking of time, when a tool company touts its equipment's throughput
rates, I'm always curious what the "trueput" of the system really is.
Not how many wafers per hour the tool can process when all subsystems
are go and the line is humming like a new father. Instead, what's the
true process rate when you factor in every single moment of idle time.
It doesn't matter what causes it, whether it's lack of wafers, periodic
maintenance, power surges, pump failures, robotic malfunction, or factory
shutdown. Does a tool with 50% true uptime (that is, actually processing
wafers for 12 out of every 24 hours) and an average wafer throughput of
80 wph really have a trueput of 40 wph over the course of a week, a month,
or a year? What if that touted throughput of 80 wph is actually the maximum
speed, and the wafers often run at a slower rate? How does one factor
in the number of scrapped or defective wafers spit out by a particular
tool or tool set? Plenty of industry metrics have been devised to deal
with these issuesoverall equipment efficiency, overall factory effectiveness,
intrinsic equipment efficiency, total productive manufacturingbut
consider trueput as a simple term that wraps up all these approaches in
a nice bundle.
The e-commerce explosion reverberating through the semiconductor supply
chain has enveloped many toolmakers and other suppliers. One of the unfortunate
side-effects of this eruption is the spewing forth of some e-gregious
assaults on my native tongue. Some of these new terms can work on one's
free associational consciousness in strange ways. Here's an example. "Vortal"
is an e-term, which means "vertical portal," a contracted word standing
for a phrase that had little meaning to begin with. When I hear this word,
it reminds me of a certain alien race from the recently completed Star
Trek TV series, Deep Space Nine. The creatures were called
the Vorta, a member species of the evil Dominion who served the Founders
as administrators of their empire. If you watched the show, you know that
the Vorta were cunning, unscrupulous beings, with a lot of bandwidth for
deceit and empty promises. So, aliens who can't be trusted and e-marketers
who can't be entrusted with the language.... Remember, if you can stick
"e-" in front of common nouns or combine certain words in ridiculous ways,
you're eligible to become a card-carrying Dot.Commie.
Tom Cheyney
Editor
tom.cheyney@cancom.com
http://www.micromagazine.com

MicroHome |
Search | Current Issue | MicroArchives
Buyers Guide | Media Kit
Questions/comments about MICRO Magazine? E-mail us at cheynman@gmail.com.
© 2007 Tom Cheyney
All rights reserved.
|